🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.